ALL In (Sep 27, 2024): OpenAI's $150B conversion, Meta's AR glasses, Blue-collar boom, Risk of nuclear war

Disclaimer:

This blog post was auto-generated by Accunote AI, aiming to make audio knowledge sharing more accessible. While we strive for accuracy, please note that AI-generated content may contain minor inaccuracies. The original ideas and insights belong to their respective creators: @AllIn

AI industry leadership dynamics: OpenAI is currently the leader in AI models and applications. They have advanced models like GPT-4, voice applications, and Sora (unreleased video generation). However, other players like Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and open-source projects are trying to catch up. Meta recently announced LLAMA 3.2 with voice capabilities, around the same time OpenAI released its voice API. The key question is how durable OpenAI's competitive advantage will be as the industry rapidly evolves.

OpenAI's valuation and financials: OpenAI is reportedly being valued at $150 billion in a new funding round. Their revenue growth has been explosive, going from $28 million in 2022 to a projected $3.4-6 billion run rate in 2024. At $3.4 billion revenue, the valuation would be 50x current revenue. At $5 billion revenue, it would be 30x current revenue or 15x next year's revenue assuming 100% year-over-year growth. This valuation could be warranted given OpenAI's strategic position and growth rate in the multi-trillion dollar AI market.

OpenAI's corporate restructuring: OpenAI is reportedly converting from a non-profit to a for-profit benefit corporation (B Corp). This structure requires the board to consider not just shareholder interests, but also the company's stated mission and external stakeholders. The non-profit entity may continue to exist as a minority shareholder in the new company. The previously discussed 100x profit cap for investors will likely be removed, potentially allowing for much higher returns.

OpenAI's funding and ownership: Bloomberg reported that OpenAI is raising $6-7 billion at a $150 billion valuation. CEO Sam Altman is expected to receive 7% equity, worth about $10.5 billion. The deal is still being finalized with lawyers and shareholders. The funding process likely involved discussions with dozens of firms, leading to information leaking to reporters.

Benefit corporations: B Corps are a variant of C corporations that are not non-profits. They require directors to be fiduciaries for both shareholders and the company's stated mission. This structure allows companies to signal to investors, the market, and employees that they care about more than just profits. Examples of B Corps include Patagonia.

AI model performance comparison: The expert highlighted that there are at least two viable open-source models that are as good as or better than OpenAI's models at any point in time. This suggests that the economic value of these models could potentially go to zero, becoming a consumer surplus for users. Such a scenario would make it theoretically very difficult to monetize these AI models.

Meta's AI integration strategy: Meta is becoming more aggressive in inserting Meta AI into all of their critical apps, which serve as the front door to billions of people daily. This includes WhatsApp, Instagram, Messenger, the Facebook app, and Threads. The strategy aims to keep users within these apps instead of leaving to use ChatGPT, by providing equally good answers with fewer clicks.

Google's AI integration approach: Google is expected to implement a similar strategy to Meta, integrating their AI version into their search engine. This would provide users with AI-powered responses directly within Google's search interface, potentially reducing the need for users to visit standalone AI chatbots like ChatGPT.

AI model data challenges: AI models may run out of viable data to differentiate themselves, leading to a race around synthetic information and data. This presents a cost problem, as creating synthetic data requires significant financial resources. Large companies like Facebook, Microsoft, Amazon, Google, and Apple have a significant advantage in this area due to their vast financial resources compared to startups.

OpenAI's human capital concerns: The expert noted an unusually high level of executive turnover at OpenAI, which is atypical for a company seemingly on a trajectory to become a trillion-dollar enterprise. This raises questions about the company's internal dynamics and long-term prospects, especially considering the substantial liquidity available to employees and the technical allure of the projects they're working on.

AI model competition landscape: The expert constructed a bear case for OpenAI based on four main factors: the threat from open-source models, front-door competition from established tech giants, the shift towards synthetic data generation, and the high executive turnover at OpenAI.

AI impact on user behavior: The expert has been exclusively using ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, replacing Google search and even reducing reliance on team members for certain tasks. This shift in behavior highlights the growing impact and utility of AI models in daily workflows.

OpenAI's GPT-4 capabilities: The expert emphasized that GPT-4, particularly the GPT-4 preview version, is a game-changer. It's described as the first real chain of thought production system, indicating a significant leap in AI capabilities compared to previous versions.

AI model analysis process: The expert demonstrated how GPT-4 analyzes complex information, such as early-stage deals and cap tables. The model took 77 seconds to process the input and provided a detailed rationale for its interpretation, including secondary queries it performed to generate the response. This level of transparency and reasoning is a distinct improvement over previous versions.

OpenAI's competitive advantage: The expert believed that OpenAI's previous version was 3 to 6 months ahead of competitors. The new GPT-4 version appears to have extended this lead, showcasing advanced capabilities in processing and analyzing complex financial information.

AI models evolve to chain-of-thought approach: The expert explained that advanced AI models now utilize a chain-of-thought approach, where the model asks itself questions to structure its response. This process involves the model breaking down the original question, determining steps to answer it, and then using language models to fill in the details. This approach mimics human thought processes and represents a significant evolution from simple predictive text generation based on single statements.

Chain-of-thought leads to AI agents: The expert highlighted that the chain-of-thought approach is a precursor to AI agents. These agents can be given objectives, break them down into tasks, and work on each task independently. OpenAI has indicated that PhD-level reasoning capabilities are next on their roadmap, followed closely by agent technology. This development is expected to have significant implications for business value and software-as-a-service opportunities.

AI agents potential impact on knowledge work: The expert suggested that AI agents could potentially replace human workers in complex knowledge work environments, such as call centers or operations centers. By mapping out workflows and integrating data, many steps in these processes could be automated using AI agents. This extends beyond call centers to various analyst roles across different business functions.

AI models revolutionizing data analysis: The expert shared personal experiences of using advanced AI models like GPT-4 for data analysis tasks. These models can quickly provide comprehensive answers that would have previously taken human analysts days to compile. This capability is transforming how knowledge work is conducted, potentially eliminating the need for traditional analyst roles in many scenarios.

AI enhancing decision-making speed and quality: The expert described how AI tools are accelerating the learning process for analysts and decision-makers. By quickly processing and analyzing large amounts of information, these tools enable faster and more informed evaluations of companies, markets, and complex documents. This rapid knowledge acquisition is significantly improving the efficiency of various business processes.

AI transforming document analysis and legal review: The expert mentioned the use of AI tools, such as Google's Notebook LLM, for analyzing multiple documents simultaneously. This capability allows for quick identification and explanation of changes in legal documents, enhancing the speed and accuracy of document review processes.

AI replacing traditional enterprise software: The expert critiqued the current state of enterprise software, describing it as often clunky and expensive. They suggested that AI could replace these systems, eliminating the need for third-party software providers to create and maintain custom solutions. This shift could potentially reduce costs and improve efficiency for businesses.

AI challenging the concept of systems of record: The expert proposed that the traditional notion of systems of record may become obsolete with the advent of AI. Instead of relying on specific software systems as the single source of truth, businesses may shift towards a model where all data exists in a pipeline of information, accessible and analyzable through AI tools.

AI's impact on systems of record: Expert highlighted that the software economy over the last 20 years, with trillions of dollars in market cap and hundreds of billions in revenue, has been built on the premise of creating systems of record. However, with AI, people will provision an agent and roughly direct what they want the outcome to be, becoming process-independent. This shift may cause systems of record to lose their grip on company data, potentially impacting the software economy.

AI's influence on company size and leverage: The atomic size of companies may change as each company will get much more leverage from using software with fewer people. This inversion creates tremendous potential for operating leverage, as companies can achieve more with fewer people and pieces of software.

Salesforce's perspective on AI and systems of record: Expert mentioned that Salesforce's CEO made a case for why systems of record won't become obsolete in the AI era. The arguments include: 1. Need for 100% accurate source of truth for critical information like employee lists and customer data. 2. Continued necessity for databases, enterprise security, compliance, and sharing models. 3. Enterprise customers' preference for integrated solutions rather than DIY approaches with AI models.

Debate on the future of SaaS and systems of record: Expert disagreed with the premises defending traditional systems of record, arguing that: 1. System integrators already exist to build apps on top of current platforms, indicating limitations in existing solutions. 2. The economy that exists today will transform to different groups of people. 3. The total cost of traditional systems of record may not be justifiable compared to alternatives emerging in the next 5-10 years.

AI's potential impact on data structures: Expert pointed out that AI hasn't yet been unleashed on the back end of data systems. In the future, AI might develop its own data structures and systems when given access to various data ingestion points in a business. This could lead to obfuscated data architecture driven by AI models.

Example of AI-driven system replacement: Expert mentioned Mechanical Orchard as an example of a company that uses AI agents to observe and reconstruct legacy systems automatically. This approach could potentially replace old systems in a matter of months, improving customer quality and NPS for companies with legacy infrastructure.

AI-first startups and pricing models: Expert highlighted that AI-first startups are approaching the market with a different cost structure. The traditional model of paying for seats (sometimes up to $5,000 per person per year) may be challenged by flat pricing models. This approach makes sense for companies that can use AI tooling to be as productive as much larger organizations, allowing for competitive pricing while maintaining desired margin structures.

AI pricing models evolve: Consumption-based pricing is becoming more common for AI startups, focusing on metrics like the number of sales calls analyzed rather than the number of sales executives employed. This shift reflects the increasing role of AI agents in performing work traditionally done by humans.

AI impact on workforce: Expert predicts that team sizes at large companies will remain static or decrease as AI agents take on more work. Future high-paying jobs at big tech companies may require individuals to outperform AI systems, potentially working alongside multiple AI agents.

AI market opportunity: Expert agrees with Benioff's assessment that there are more net new opportunities for AI companies than disruption of existing players. While the exact future of AI is uncertain, the overall trend suggests more new opportunities than displacement of current market leaders.

Palantir's AI approach: Palantir, currently the most highly valued public software company in terms of ARR multiple, is perceived as having a significant AI opportunity. Their approach involves: 1. Integrating with all customer systems, especially in large enterprises and government agencies 2. Collecting data in one place to create a "digital twin" 3. Enabling both human analysts and AI to work with the consolidated data This positions Palantir to effectively leverage AI workflows in complex enterprise environments.

Enterprise AI integration challenges: Implementing AI in large enterprises requires integration with existing systems rather than completely replacing them. This approach is generally easier and less disruptive than attempting to overhaul entire systems.

AI impact on pricing: The introduction of open-source and closed-source AI models has led to a significant decrease in price per token, making AI incredibly deflationary. This cost reduction is expected to impact pricing for AI-based solutions, potentially making them an order of magnitude cheaper than existing alternatives.

AI market expansion: While there's a tendency to focus on disruption of existing markets, the AI revolution is likely to significantly expand the overall market size. However, individual company "slices" of this larger market may become smaller as competition increases and efficiency improves.

AI impact on company efficiency: Major tech companies like Google, Uber, Airbnb, and Meta are maintaining or reducing employee numbers while growing revenue by 20-30% annually. This trend is leading to a doubling of revenue per employee every 2-3 years, highlighting increased efficiency due to AI and related technologies.

OpenAI structural changes: OpenAI is transitioning from a nonprofit to a corporation, with CEO Sam Altman reportedly receiving a $10 billion stock package. This change has raised questions about the company's motives and structure.

Nonprofit to for-profit conversion strategy: The conversation speculates on the potential advantages of starting as a nonprofit to avoid income tax and outcompete rivals, then converting to a for-profit once market dominance is achieved. The speakers suggest this strategy, if legal, could be widely adopted by companies in competitive markets.

Contrasting treatment of tech leaders: The speakers express concern over the contrast between Elon Musk losing $55 billion due to a legal decision regarding his Tesla compensation package, and Sam Altman potentially gaining $10 billion through OpenAI's restructuring. They suggest this disparity may not reflect an ideal functioning of the system.

iOS 18 beta Siri performance underwhelms: The expert tested the iOS 18 beta version of Siri, which is expected to function as an LLM similar to ChatGPT. However, the performance was disappointing. When attempting to send a message, Siri hallucinated and nearly sent an off-color joke to the wrong contact. The expert concluded that the current version is not very effective.

Apple's AI strategy may challenge OpenAI: Apple's development of iOS 18 with enhanced Siri capabilities could potentially siphon off half the searches that would have gone to ChatGPT. This move suggests Apple is working to reduce dependency on external AI platforms like ChatGPT, which could pose a serious challenge to OpenAI's market position.

Meta developing impressive AR glasses: Meta is reportedly working on augmented reality (AR) glasses that are showing impressive capabilities. This development in interface technology could potentially impact the AI landscape and user interaction methods.

OpenAI's corporate structure and compensation issues: The expert discussed the complex organizational structure of OpenAI and recent changes in its corporate setup. OpenAI has transitioned from a non-profit to a for-profit structure, leading to compensation adjustments. Sam Altman, the CEO, is reportedly receiving a $10 billion compensation package. However, there's controversy surrounding Elon Musk's lack of compensation despite his initial $50 million investment.

Elon Musk's investment in OpenAI: Elon Musk invested $50 million as a seed investor and co-founder in OpenAI when it was established as a non-profit. The expert argues that with the company's transition to a for-profit model, it's unfair that Musk hasn't received any compensation or equity for his initial investment.

OpenAI's restructuring and transparency: The expert previously suggested that OpenAI should clean up its organizational chart, open up its books, and provide fair compensation to key individuals. While the company has made some progress in restructuring and providing options to Sam Altman, they have not addressed Elon Musk's situation.

Controversy over OpenAI's treatment of Elon Musk: The expert criticizes OpenAI's approach to Elon Musk, suggesting that by not offering him any compensation for his initial investment, they are essentially challenging him to sue them. This approach is viewed as unprincipled and unfair.

Arguments regarding Elon Musk's compensation: Some argue that Elon Musk was given the opportunity to invest in OpenAI's for-profit side along with other investors like Reid Hoffman and Vinod Khosla, but declined. However, the expert contends that Musk shouldn't have been obligated to invest more, given his initial $50 million contribution and the original non-profit nature of the organization.

AR glasses advance computing interfaces: The expert highlighted that Meta's AR glasses represent a significant shift in computing interfaces, potentially the biggest transition since mobile. This new "ambient computing" method allows users to state objectives more naturally, replacing directive processes like typing and clicking.

Five core elements for ambient computing: The expert outlined five essential components for ambient computing: 1. Voice control 2. Gesture control 3. Eye control 4. Audio response 5. Integrated visual interface These elements are replacing traditional input methods like mice, keyboards, and touchscreens.

OpenAI's voice control progress: The expert praised OpenAI's voice control system, describing a personal experience of using it for a 30-minute interactive quiz during a walk, demonstrating its effectiveness and natural interaction.

Apple Vision Pro's gesture control: The expert noted that Apple Vision Pro already offers advanced gesture control, allowing single finger movements to trigger actions.

Future of mobile devices: The expert predicted that mobile handsets might not exist in 10 years, with the browser interface disappearing. Computing is expected to shift towards an ambient model that exists everywhere, all the time.

Meta's AR glasses progress: The expert commended Meta for their persistence in developing AR glasses, noting that their latest iteration looks meaningfully better than Apple's Vision Pro. However, they questioned whether glasses are the ideal form factor for ubiquitous adoption.

Debate on visual interface necessity: The experts discussed the importance of visual interfaces in various scenarios, such as online shopping or restaurant selection. One expert argued that existing screens could suffice for most use cases, while another emphasized the potential of AR glasses to reduce phone-checking disruptions in social situations.

Potential use cases for AR glasses: The experts debated potential applications for AR glasses, including: - Viewing notifications without taking out a phone - Tracking ride-sharing services in real-time - Reducing anxiety from constant phone checking

Meta Orion glasses appearance: An expert noted that Meta's Orion glasses look more natural and wearable in public compared to Apple's Vision Pro, describing them as looking similar to Eugene Levy's glasses but still appearing semi-normal.

Apple Vision Pro's declining relevance: An expert observed that Apple Vision Pro is rarely mentioned now, suggesting Meta's AR glasses represent a major advancement in comparison.

AR/VR device evolution: Meta's AR glasses represent a significant step in wearable technology, but may not be the ultimate form factor for AI-integrated devices. The expert believes that looking back 25-30 years from now, the killer AI device might be something we don't recognize today. It could be smaller than the palm of a hand, with a simple screen and minimal buttons, primarily driven by audio, gestures, and eye control. This evolution is made possible by AI advancements in predictive text, gesture control, eye tracking, and audio processing.

Voice interface potential: Voice as a modality for device interaction is considered more credible for widespread adoption across 8 billion people. The expert suggests that voice interfaces could be less disruptive to social decorum compared to AR glasses or goggles, which may violate certain social norms. Voice-controlled devices might be more acceptable in various settings, from urban environments to remote locations like trekking in Nepal.

AI-driven personal assistants: The integration of AI in wearable devices enables them to function as true personal digital assistants. AI allows for natural language processing, computer vision, and understanding of the world around the user. This combination of technologies can create a more ambient computing experience that keeps users engaged with the physical world while providing necessary information and services.

Meta's strategic positioning: Meta is executing well in the AR/VR space. The company has made significant advancements in AI, catching up and potentially leading in areas like social media with LLaMA 3.2. Their investments in AR technology, made before the current AI boom, have positioned them favorably in the market. The expert credits Mark Zuckerberg for acknowledging past mistakes in content moderation and for the company's successful cost-cutting measures.

Changing user behavior: The expert anticipates a shift in user behavior due to AI integration. Currently, people experience anxiety and addiction related to constantly checking apps and notifications. AI agents could streamline tasks like booking rides or finding information, reducing the need for constant app interactions. This change could lead to more face-to-face interactions and less screen time.

Airpods as potential game-changer: The expert highlights the potential of Airpods becoming more socially acceptable for 24/7 wear, especially with their utility as hearing aids. As the form factor shrinks and becomes less obtrusive, it could lead to novel use cases that blend seamlessly into users' physical appearance.

Historical perspective on device evolution: The expert draws parallels between current AR/VR developments and past technological evolutions, such as Apple's journey from the Newton to the iPhone, and Microsoft's early tablet attempts. These examples illustrate how initial bulky or impractical designs can eventually lead to revolutionary products, suggesting that the current AR/VR devices might be precursors to more refined and widely adopted technologies in the future.

Tech job market shifts towards blue-collar and vocational skills: The tech job market is experiencing a significant shift, with developer jobs down 30% since February 2020 according to Indeed. Over half a million tech jobs have been eliminated since 2022 based on layoffs.fyi data. Entry-level tech workers and recent college graduates are being hit hardest. Concurrently, there's a growing trend towards blue-collar and vocational skills, dubbed the "tool belt generation" for Gen Z. A poll of 1,000 teens found that about half believe a high school degree, trade program, or 2-year degree best meets their career needs, while 56% said real-world, on-the-job experience is more valuable than obtaining a college degree.

Higher education system faces pressure from vocational alternatives: The trend towards vocational skills is putting pressure on the higher education system. It challenges the notion that a university education is necessary for economic stability and freedom. The expert highlighted that this trend could break the stranglehold that the university education system has on America's youth, questioning the high costs and returns of higher education. The ability to get a trade degree and live an economically productive life is forcing universities to justify their high costs and demonstrate the value they provide in return.

Shift in perception of computer science education: The expert suggested that even computer science degrees might become less valuable compared to practical coding skills. Learning JavaScript and other tools in a boot camp for much less money could be more beneficial, allowing graduates to start earning immediately. This shift challenges the traditional perception of computer science as a "safe" academic field.

AI impact on job market less severe than feared: Despite concerns about AI-driven job losses, the expert believes the impact will be less severe than feared. For instance, coders are estimated to be 10-30% more productive with AI coding assistant tools, but human coders are still needed as the demand for software is unlimited. While there will be disruptions in knowledge worker and service sectors, the expert expects there will still be plenty of work for humans, including in blue-collar spaces.

Education cost-benefit imbalance: The expert pointed out a significant shift in the cost-benefit balance of higher education. In the past, spending $10k-$20k per year on college education often led to entry-level jobs paying $50k-$70k. Now, students might spend $200k on education only to earn $50k annually, creating a much less favorable return on investment.

Federal student loan program's impact on education costs: The expert highlighted how the federal student loan program has contributed to inflated education costs. With no discrimination between schools in loan approval, the underwriting criteria necessary for a free market to work has been destroyed. This has led to a situation where students can take on significant debt for degrees that may not be valuable in the job market.

Growing premium on human touch and artisanal services: As mass production and industrialization become more prevalent, there's an emerging premium on human touch and artisanal services. This trend is seen across various sectors, from food (artisanal chocolates, microbreweries) to clothing (handmade, luxury goods). The expert predicts a blossoming in human service jobs, including areas like fitness classes, personal tutoring, and self-development, which don't necessarily require traditional degrees.

Value of storytelling and experience in products and services: The expert emphasized the growing importance of storytelling and experience in products and services. Using examples like Laura Piana's vicuna products or white truffles from Italy, the expert illustrated how consumers are increasingly valuing the story behind products and the unique experiences they offer, beyond just the functional aspects.

Nuclear weapons escalation risks in Middle East conflict: Expert highlighted the potential for escalation in the Middle East conflict, particularly if Israel incurs further into Lebanon against Hezbollah, potentially drawing Iran into more active involvement. This could lead to a complex geopolitical situation where Russia might start providing supplies to Iran, similar to how the West is supplying Ukraine. The expert provided a comparison of military capabilities: Iran has 600,000 active duty military, 350,000 in reserve, 19 submarines, and a 600-kilometer range missile system. Israel has 170,000 active duty, half a million reserve personnel, 15 warships, 5 submarines, and potentially up to 400 nuclear weapons, including a wide range of tactical sub-1 kiloton nuclear weapons. The expert expressed concern about the potential for Israel to respond aggressively if further threatened, given its significant military arsenal in the Middle East.

Global implications of Middle East conflict escalation: Expert discussed the broader implications of an escalating Middle East conflict, including potential responses from Saudi Arabia and Russia. Expert noted that the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict adds another layer of complexity, with Russia reportedly stating that any further attacks on their land could result in a nuclear response. This statement was described as "insane" by the expert, highlighting the gravity of the current geopolitical situation.

Comparison of nuclear weapon yields and potential tactical use: Expert provided a visual comparison of nuclear weapon yields, ranging from bunker busters to the largest ever tested (Tsar Bomba). The Hiroshima bomb was 15 kilotons, while the Tsar Bomba caused shock waves that circled the Earth three times. Expert emphasized the existence of many 0.1 to 1 kiloton nuclear bombs, considered tactical nuclear weapons, which fall between bunker busters and the Hiroshima bomb in yield. The concern is that these tactical nuclear weapons might be used if countries like Israel or Russia feel cornered with no other tactical response available.

Global nuclear arsenal and hair-trigger alert systems: Expert highlighted the current global nuclear situation: approximately 12,000 nuclear weapons with an average payload of 100 kilotons exist worldwide. The United States has a large stockpile, Russia has the largest, and China has the third-largest. Many of these weapons are on hair-trigger alert systems, which adds to the risk of accidental or rapid escalation. The expert emphasized that this situation puts the world on the brink of potential nuclear conflict.

Concerns about nuclear weapon use and global response: Expert raised concerns about the potential use of smaller yield nuclear weapons (0.1 to 1 kiloton) and the uncertain global response to such an action. The expert questioned how the world would respond if a country were to detonate a small tactical nuclear weapon, emphasizing the precarious nature of the current geopolitical situation and the potential for rapid escalation.

Nuclear threat escalation concerns experts: The expert highlighted the grave concern over the potential use of nuclear weapons, emphasizing that if a country possessing nuclear capabilities is pushed to the brink, it could lead to a catastrophic escalation. The expert expressed nervousness about the current trajectory and the need for deceleration, noting that the situation could quickly spiral out of control. The expert stressed the importance of understanding the nonzero probability of such an event and the urgent need to find an "off-ramp" to prevent further escalation.

Middle East conflict risks regional war: The expert analyzed the current situation in the Middle East, describing it as the beginning stages of what might be called the "third Lebanon war." The expert outlined the historical context of previous conflicts and discussed the current challenges faced by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). The expert highlighted the risks of a ground invasion in Lebanon, suggesting it could play into Hezbollah's hands by turning into a guerrilla war. The expert also noted the potential for escalation if Hezbollah attacks northern Israel or if Iran becomes involved, which could inevitably draw the United States into the conflict.

Ukraine war escalation and diplomatic opportunities missed: The expert discussed the ongoing war in Ukraine, expressing concern over the missed diplomatic opportunities to resolve the conflict peacefully. The expert cited reports of a potential deal in Istanbul during the first month of the war, which was allegedly blocked by the Biden administration. The expert highlighted the current dire situation in Ukraine, mentioning high casualty rates and the potential for Ukraine to become combat incapable in the near future. The expert warned about the increasing risk of direct Western intervention to save Ukraine from collapse.

Media portrayal and public perception of war risks: The expert criticized the media's portrayal of the Ukraine conflict, arguing that it has not provided fair and balanced reporting. The expert suggested that this biased coverage has led to a lack of public awareness about the true risks of escalation. The expert emphasized the importance of seeking peace and settlement before the situation spirals into a potential World War III scenario, warning that opposition to the war is often mischaracterized as being pro-Russian.

Nuclear age demands caution and awareness: The expert stressed the critical nature of the current global situation, quoting Jeffrey Sachs: "You don't get a second chance in the nuclear age." The expert emphasized the need for increased public awareness and concern about the escalating conflicts, drawing a comparison to the Cuban Missile Crisis when the public was more engaged with the potential risks. The expert warned against complacency and the misconception that these conflicts cannot affect the general population.

Expert warns against dismissing conflict risks: The expert cautioned against dismissing the risks of current global conflicts, suggesting that when every pundit and person in a position of authority claims there is nothing to worry about, it might indicate a more significant risk than acknowledged. The expert advised skepticism towards unanimous reassurances and emphasized the importance of remaining vigilant about potential escalation of conflicts.